Pakistan’s Unrest | Frederick Barton, with Mark Irvine and Thomas Patterson

In the latest CSIS Critical Questions, Rick Barton, with Mark Irvine and Thomas Patterson, comment on the latest series of internal events to raise concern about the future and stability of Pakistan. From Pakistan’s Unrest: What impact will the restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry have on the rule of law? What should happen next? The restoration of Chief Justice Chaudhry and other sacked judges is an important step and a critical one symbolically. However, restoring the old judges falls far short of the reform necessary to create an effective judicial system that meets the demands of the Pakistani public. While structural reform and capacity building are long-term processes, the government can take additional steps to clear the air and generate confidence in the system. It should initiate thorough and independent reviews of lingering issues, such as the disappearances of terror suspects and government opponents. U.S. leaders have wisely decided to side with the swell of public opinion, visibly praising the government’s concessions and the restoration of Chief Justice Chaudhry. Nevertheless, the United States must tread softly in its relations with Pakistan. It cannot be seen to have undue influence over domestic political leaders. Influencing a domestic party, either through negotiation or assistance, will probably only serve to undermine and weaken the legitimacy and authority of that party. This does not mean, however, that the United States should do nothing. It should continue to promote democracy and a strong and independent judiciary and offer counterinsurgency support to the Pakistani military (which is currently conducting large-scale operations against militants). Most of all, the United States should put the interests of the Pakistani people first, which are in line with its own long-term values and interests.