• May 4, 2010

    Iran Angrily Defends Nuclear Program
    NY Times by Neil Mac Farquhar

    Obama administration discloses size of U.S. nuclear arsenal
    WP by Mary Beth Sheridan and Colum Lynch

    Israel's stance on nuclear arms complicates efforts against Iran
    WP by Walter Pincus

    China to press North's Kim on economy, nuclear talks
    Reuters by Royston Chan

    GOP Senators Remain Wary of U.S.-Russian Arms Control Deal
    Global Security Newswire by Rachel Oswald

  • May 4, 2010

    By John K. Warden

    At PONI’s 7th Live Debate, Ivan Oelrich, Vice President for Strategic Security Programs at the Federation of American Scientists; Clark Murdock, PONI Director and Senior Advisor at CSIS; and Doug Feith, Senior Fellow at the Hudson Institute, expressed their opinions on 2010 Nuclear Posture Review (NPR).  While it was designed as a more traditional panel, the discussion turned into one of the more lively debates of the series.

  • May 3, 2010


    By Chris Jones

    Day 1 of the 2010 Review Conference is in the books. The main fireworks of the first day were the speeches by UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and Secretary of State Clinton. Ahmadinejad’s statement proved particularly controversial as the P3 and other European states followed past tradition and left during the speech while others in the room applauded his remarks. It is too early to tell what impact the opening moves by the U.S. and Iran to curry favor with the “swing states” but there are two signs worth noting that could benefit the United States.

    First, Secretary-General Ki-moon’s remarks both took note of recent U.S. efforts to move toward Article VI and made detailed comments about Iran. He applauded the signing of the New START treaty and acknowledged the Nuclear Security Summit, though also pointing out key outstanding issues such as ratification of CTBT. With respect to Iran, he stated:

    With respect to the Iranian nuclear programme, I call on Iran to fully comply with Security Council resolutions and fully cooperate with the IAEA.
    I encourage Iran to accept the nuclear fuel supply proposal put forward by the Agency. This would be an important confidence-building measure.
    And I encourage the President of Iran to engage constructively. Let us be clear: the onus is on Iran to clarify the doubts and concerns about its programme.

    That is pretty strong language to get out of the Secretary General for the opening statement at the Review Conference. Meanwhile, Iran did little to directly address claims of noncompliance beyond saying there was “not a single credible proof.” Instead, Ahmadinejad’s remarks centered around themes such as the destructiveness of nuclear weapons, the threatening actions of the United States and “the Zionist regime,” and the greatness of Iranian culture.

  • May 3, 2010

    By Andrew St. Denis

    A short while ago, the Department of Defense released previously classified figures on the size of the U.S. nuclear stockpile. From the document (found here):

  • May 3, 2010


    By Chris Jones

    Glimpsing at the sound bytes on Iran over the past couple weeks, it would seem Secretary Gates could be criticized for flip flopping a la the Kerry campaign.  The NYT reported a couple weeks back that:

    Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates has warned in a secret three-page memorandum to top White House officials that the United States does not have an effective long-range policy for dealing with Iran’s steady progress toward nuclear capability, according to government officials familiar with the document.

    Yet Gates was quoted in the Washington Post last week as saying:

    Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on Tuesday he was satisfied with Pentagon planning to counter the threat posed by Iran's nuclear program.
    "I'm very satisfied with the planning process both within this building and in the inter-agency. We spend a lot of time on Iran and we'll continue to do so," Gates told reporters at a press conference with Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak.

    What gives? Probably a few things. First of all, there is a crucial three month period between when the memo was written and leaked. Presumably, that would provide a window in which the Administration could work to address Gates’ concerns in the original memo. Second, there have been important backtracks on both of these stories. Shanker and Sanger published a piece the day after the original NYT piece featuring Gates’ “push back” on the claim the memo was a “wake up” call. Meanwhile, the Pentagon had a little trouble clarifying the intention of Gates’ most recent statement. Undersecretary Flournoy stated that the military option is a “last resort” that “is not on the table in the near term” while Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell later clarified that “military action has never, ever been taken off the table.”

  • May 3, 2010

    U.S. Is Pushing to Deter a Mideast Nuclear Race
    NY Times by William J. Broad and David E. Sanger

    Iran's advances in nuclear technology spark new concerns about weapons
    WP by Joby Warrick

    U.S. Releasing Nuclear Data on Its Arsenal
    NY Times by David E. Sanger

    NATO Weighs Reviving Conventional Forces Pact With Russia
    Global Security Newswire

    US, Egypt negotiate Mideast nuclear-free zone: report

  • Apr 28, 2010

    Gates "very satisfied" with planning on Iran
    Reuters by Adam Entous and Phil Stewart

    Brazil urges Iran to issue nuclear pledge
    Yahoo!News by AFP

    Clinton to Head U.S. Team at NPT Review Conference
    Global Security Newswire

    Ahmadinejad coming to America?
    Foreign Policy (Turtle Bay blog) by Colum Lynch

    'Stray S.Korean mine could not have sunk warship'

  • Apr 27, 2010


    Last Thursday, PONI Debates the Issues hosted the second event of 2010.  The event featured a panel discussion the NPR with remarks by Ivan Oelrich, Clark Murdock, and Doug Feith.  The audio for the event can be found here and the video is below.  

  • Apr 27, 2010

    Iran Reactor-Fuel Swap Floated by Brazil, Tied to Cooperation
    Bloomberg by Ali Sheikholeslami

    U.S. prepared to take action if N. Korea behind ship sinking: Campbell
    Yonhap News by Kim Young-gyo

    Russia Open to Joint Missile Defense With NATO, Medvedev Says
    Global Security Newswire

    Using Virtual Reality To Make Nuclear Reality Safer
    NPR by Mike Shuster

    South Korea at Sea on Response to Boat Sinking
    Asia Sentinel Op-Ed by Lee Byong-Chul

  • Apr 23, 2010

    On April 6th PONI brought together a group of graduate students in the U.S. with a delegation of graduate students from India’s prestigious Jawaharlal Nehru University for a day of talks on several timely and important issues. PONI Director Clark Murdock chaired the day’s talks, which focused on five general topics: the implications of the planned expanded use of nuclear power worldwide, current proliferation challenges, the threat of nuclear terrorism, stability-instability dynamics in South Asia, and nuclear disarmament.

Syndicate content