PDI Live Debates

PDI Live Debates
The debate series, an extension of the PDI blog, features top experts debating controversial nuclear issues one-on-one.

As an extension of the PONI Debates the Issus (PDI) blog, PONI periodically hosts live debates on urgent or otherwise controversial nuclear issues and policies. The debate format permits a more dynamic, free-flowing exchange of ideas than what typically transpires during moderated panel discussions, lectures, and presentations, resulting in an enriched yet focused examination of critical issues. The objective is not to determine winners and losers or to establish the right way to solve a problem, but rather to explore a topic in a manner that elucidates underlying assumptions about the issue at-hand and that identifies specific points of agreement and departure. A thorough understanding of the information and assumptions that inform divergent viewpoints on nuclear issues can ultimately lead to better approaches and policy options.

Debate 1 - Resolved: The U.S. federal government should provide the requested funding for the Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW) program. Clark Murdock, Senior Advisor, CSIS (Affirmative) vs. Joseph Cirincione, President, Ploughshares Fund (Negative). February 12, 2009. Event page with live video.

Debate 2 - Resolved: The Obama Administration should make the Global Zero vision of a world free of nuclear weapons a central focus of its foreign policy. George Perkovich, Vice President of Studies, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (Affirmative) vs. J.D. Crouch, Deputy National Security Adviser and Assistant to President George W. Bush (Negative). April 13, 2009. Event page with live video.

Debate 3 - Resolved: The U.S. Congress should ratify the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT). Daryll Kimball, Executive Director, Arms Control Association (Affirmative) vs. Stephen Rademaker, Senior Counsel, BGR Group, Inc. (Negative). May 13, 2009. Event page with live video.

Debate 4 - Resolved: that the United States should continue the policy of complete and verifiable disarmament of the Korean Peninsula. Bruce Klingner, Senior Research Fellow, Heritage Foundation (Affirmative), vs. Doug Bandow, Senior Fellow, CATO Institute (Negative). July 15, 2009. Event page with live video.

Debate 5 - Resolved: that the United States should pursue a negotiated agreement with Russia to de-alert each country's nuclear arsenal by implementing reversible physical changes to substantially increase the time required to launch. John Steinbrunner, Professor of Public Policy, University of Maryland (Affirmative), vs. Walter Slocombe, Former Undersecretary of Defense for Policy (Negative). November 5, 2009. Event page with live video.

 

Blog

  • Nov 11, 2009

    Last week, we hosted our fifth live debate.  In one of the best debates of the series, John Steinbruner, Professor of Public Policy at the University of Maryland, and Walt Slocombe, former Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, debated about de-alerting the U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals.  The audio and video is available here.

    The specific topic wording was:

    Resolved: that the United States should pursue a negotiated agreement with Russia to de-alert each country's nuclear arsenal by implementing reversible physical changes to substantially increase the time required to launch

    Each side, Steinbruner on the affirmative and Slocombe on the negative, gave an opening statement.  The statements were followed by a series of question periods (asking each other, moderator, then audience) and brief closing remarks.

  • Nov 5, 2009

    Here's the final resolution and agenda for tonight's de-alerting debate between John Steinbruner and Walt Slocombe.  You can still RSVP by contacting Chris Jones at: cjones@csis.org.  We look forward to seeing you tonight.

    PONI Live Debate: De-Alerting
    November 5, 2009, 6:00-8:00 P.M.
    B1 Conference Center, CSIS

    Resolved: that the United States should pursue a negotiated agreement with Russia to de-alert each country's nuclear arsenal by implementing reversible physical changes to substantially increase the time required to launch

    6:00-6:20     OPENING RECEPTION AND WELCOME

    6:20-7:30     THE DE-ALERTING DEBATE
    Affirmative: John D. Steinbruner, Professor of Public Policy at the University of Maryland
    Negative: Walter B. Slocombe, Former Undersecretary of Defense for Policy
    Moderator: John K. Warden, Project on Nuclear Issues, CSIS

    6:20-6:35   Opening Statements
    6:35-6:50   Cross-Examination and Moderator Questions
    6:50-7:20   Audience Question and Answer
    7:20-7:30   Closing Statements

    7:30-8:00     CLOSING RECEPTION